austin_dern (austin_dern) wrote,
austin_dern
austin_dern

I study nuclear science, I love my classes

The bad news is, I had to get up at 7 am. I know people with grownup jobs will be slapping me silly for that complaint, but it is early for me, and on a weekend, and I've been running on a sleep deficit since 1987. But it was in a good cause, to attend a presentation of research projects like the one I was mentoring students for last term. Alas, my students weren't asked to put on a talk, but I don't feel bad for them. Their Poster Presentation got a certificate of distinction and, better, their research won a cash prize meant to encourage their work in math and science. This reflects more on them than on me, but I will mention it in my next teaching portfolio.

The oral presentations showed the typical strengths and weaknesses of students' first big talk -- over-explaining unnecessary detail (one project used a remote-controlled model airplane, and tried to explain where lift comes from), or having no idea where they were going, despite the talk being on Powerpoint slides (one number theory talk I came away noticing only either a typo or just an error). I think the most characteristic new-presenter glitch, besides overdoing segues from one presenter to another (``I turn things over to Thomas to explain our research method'' ``Thank you, I'm Thomas, and I'll be explaining our research method'') or talk structure (yes, introduction, research method, experiments, analysis, conclusions is a good order), was not repeating the audience member's question before answering it. This lead one group to get the same question several times and to answer testily, ``As we already said --''.

My only question during the day was, I thought, a softball for a group in desperate trouble -- asking who was the person a process they used was named for -- but they hadn't thought to look him up, which is a shame, since the history of mathematics and science is filled with fascinating, by which I mean entertainingly insane, people. (They guessed he was a mathematician, doing mathematics; as it happens, he was a geologist who got named in the history of mathematics -- though, oddly, overlooked in the history of geology -- because he noticed an interesting sequence and sent a four-paragraph paper explaining it to a journal.)

Where things started to get a bit silly was in passing out tokens of appreciation, a major Singaporean pastime. They began with certificates to students for their work, then extra certificates for the judged-outsanding work, then lucite blocks for the Superior Mentors (I was not among them; I haven't been given a block of lucite since 1985), then plates for the people who ran the overall program, then tokens for the people who organized the presentations, culminating with a gift in a box for the person responsible for today's session, who was unable to attend.

Trivia: Jack Swigert was North American's designated test pilot for the Gemini Rogallo wing hang glider-landing mechanism. Source: We Have Capture, Thomas P Stafford and Michael Cassutt.

Currently Reading: Measuring the Universe: The Historical Quest to Quantify Space, Kitty Ferguson.

Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 12 comments